Jaguar Clubs of North America JCNA Home

2001 "Webbies"
JCNA Website Awards Results

back

Results for the 2nd Annual JCNA Website awards are in. Congratulations to Steve Averill ( Jaguar Drivers Club of Northwest America ), Best Overall, Mark Stephenson ( Jaguar Club of Central Arizona ) Best Content and Jerry Mouton ( Jaguar Associate Group ) Best Graphics.

The Communications Committe wishes to thank the judges who took the time to visit the 34 JCNA Affiliate Club sites and score them in the various categories. Complete summary of results and information on the various categories are available on this page.

 

Overall :

1 Jaguar Drivers Club of Northwest America 84.7 Steve Averill
2 Jaguar Club of Florida 82.2 Tom Kopke
3 Jaguar Club of Central Arizona 82.0 Mark Stephenson
4 Jaguar Associate Group San Francisco 81.0 Jerry Mouton
5 Jaguar Society of South Carolina 80.3 Darryl Beech

Content :

1 Jaguar Club of Central Arizona 48.9 Mark Stephenson
2 Jaguar Associate Group San Francisco 48.3 Jerry Mouton
3 Jaguar Club of Florida 47.5 Tom Kopke
4 Jaguar Society of South Carolina 46.9 Darryl Beech
5 Jaguar Touring Club ( New Jersey ) 43.9 Mike Frank

Note : JDRCNWA received 51.7 but is not elligible for content award as Overall Winner

Graphics :

1 Jaguar Associate Group San Francisco 16.3 Jerry Mouton
2 Jaguar Society of South Carolina 16.1 Darryl Beech
tie Jaguar Club of Central Arizona 16.1 Mark Stephenson
4 Jaguar Club of Florida 15.8 Tom Kopke
5 Jaguar Club of Greater Las Vegas 15.3 Doug Wolbach

Note : Virginia Jaguar Club and South Florida Jaguar Club were not elligible in 2001 as winners in Overall and Graphics for 2001.

 

Final Score Summary ( alphabetical ) :

Club over-
all		 Uniq. Quant. Time. Qual. Value Imag. Total
Content		 Nav.
Intuitiv.		 Orign. Consit. Styling Total
Graph.		 Comp. Load. Banners Errors Total
Tech.
Canadian XKJR 69.3 7.1 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.3 5.6 38.3 7.7 5.8 8.1 6.6 14.2 8.3 7.7 9.2 8.3 16.8
Carolina JC 63.2 6.8 5.3 5.0 6.3 5.5 6.0 35.0 6.7 6.0 7.0 6.8 13.5 7.8 5.2 8.7 7.3 14.7
CJ Association 51.4 5.4 3.6 3.0 3.4 3.8 5.2 24.4 5.0 4.4 5.4 5.4 10.0 9.2 5.8 9.6 9.4 17.0
Illinois JC 64.5 6.4 5.4 6.6 5.8 6.0 5.5 35.6 6.9 5.6 7.0 5.5 12.5 8.3 8.1 8.5 7.8 16.4
J Touring Club 75.3 7.4 7.0 7.6 7.4 7.3 7.1 43.9 7.4 7.3 7.9 7.4 14.9 7.6 8.0 8.9 8.4 16.6
JAG Indiana 53.8 5.3 5.0 2.9 4.5 4.0 4.6 26.3 7.0 5.4 6.6 5.0 11.9 7.9 7.6 8.5 7.4 15.6
JAG Michigan 18.2 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.4 8.0 1.4 1.8 3.0 2.6 4.4 4.6 3.6 1.0 2.6 5.8
JAG San Francisco 81.0 8.1 8.1 8.4 7.8 7.8 8.1 48.3 8.1 8.0 8.1 7.9 16.3 8.6 7.3 8.8 8.6 16.5
JAG St Louis 58.0 5.8 4.0 5.3 5.2 4.2 4.8 29.3 6.7 6.0 6.8 6.0 12.8 8.0 7.3 8.5 7.7 15.8
JANE 58.7 5.9 5.3 5.6 5.7 5.3 5.9 33.6 6.0 5.6 6.1 5.1 11.3 7.1 6.4 7.4 6.7 13.9
JC Central AZ 82.0 8.9 8.0 8.3 8.0 7.6 8.1 48.9 8.3 8.4 7.6 7.7 16.1 9.1 8.1 9.3 8.7 17.7
JC Las Vegas 77.4 8.3 7.5 8.3 7.5 7.3 6.8 45.5 6.3 8.5 8.0 7.5 15.3 8.3 8.1 8.6 8.0 16.6
JC Pittsburgh 54.0 5.4 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.4 5.0 30.4 6.2 4.6 6.6 4.0 10.6 8.0 6.0 4.4 7.6 13.0
JC Southern AZ 40.6 3.5 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.6 19.1 4.5 2.8 4.4 3.1 7.3 7.1 6.8 7.5 6.9 14.3
JC Southern NE 51.4 5.1 5.0 5.4 4.7 4.9 4.4 29.6 5.0 4.6 4.9 4.4 9.4 7.0 6.7 4.4 6.9 12.4
JC Tulsa 55.3 6.0 5.4 4.9 4.7 4.9 4.4 30.3 6.0 5.4 5.4 5.6 11.1 7.7 7.7 7.6 4.3 13.9
JCO Florida 82.2 8.3 7.8 7.7 7.8 8.2 7.7 47.5 8.2 7.8 7.8 8.0 15.8 9.0 8.7 9.3 9.3 18.2
JCO Houston 74.3 7.3 7.0 7.5 6.3 7.3 7.7 43.2 7.8 7.7 7.5 6.8 15.0 6.7 8.3 9.0 8.5 16.2
JDC Long Island 53.1 5.0 3.0 4.0 4.7 3.6 5.0 25.3 6.6 5.3 6.4 5.9 12.0 7.9 7.6 8.1 8.0 15.9
JDRCNWA 84.7 8.8 8.8 9.0 8.5 8.3 8.2 51.7 7.8 7.7 7.5 6.8 15.0 9.2 8.5 9.3 9.0 18.0
JOA Southwest 67.0 6.8 5.5 7.4 6.4 6.6 6.3 38.9 6.1 6.3 6.8 6.0 12.8 7.9 7.8 7.6 7.5 15.4
JOC LA 74.3 7.7 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.7 7.7 43.3 8.7 6.7 6.7 7.3 14.7 8.0 8.3 8.0 8.7 16.3
JOC Oregon 58.1 5.3 4.6 5.3 5.6 4.9 4.6 30.1 5.7 5.4 6.9 5.3 11.7 8.6 6.9 9.6 8.0 16.3
JS South Carolina 80.3 8.0 7.4 8.1 7.9 7.4 8.0 46.9 8.0 7.6 8.3 8.6 16.1 8.3 8.4 9.1 8.7 17.3
Nation Capital JOC 70.3 7.2 6.2 6.5 6.3 5.7 6.3 38.2 7.8 7.2 7.5 6.5 14.5 8.8 8.8 9.3 8.3 17.7
Ontario JOA 52.9 4.6 4.1 4.4 4.3 4.4 3.6 25.4 6.1 4.6 6.0 3.9 10.3 8.6 8.0 8.4 9.1 17.1
Ottawa JC 56.2 5.5 4.3 5.3 4.7 4.7 4.7 29.2 6.2 4.8 6.7 4.8 11.3 7.7 8.2 8.2 7.5 15.7
Pacific JEG 58.9 5.8 5.1 5.1 5.5 4.8 5.0 31.3 6.3 5.5 6.8 5.8 12.1 7.5 6.5 9.3 7.8 15.5
Rocky Mountain JC 68.9 7.3 6.9 6.3 6.7 6.4 7.1 40.7 6.7 7.1 7.4 7.4 14.3 7.3 5.7 7.7 7.4 13.9
Sacramento JC 51.8 5.3 3.9 4.5 4.1 4.0 4.0 25.8 6.1 4.3 5.8 4.4 10.3 7.8 8.0 8.4 7.1 15.8
San Antonio JC 59.0 5.5 4.0 3.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 28.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 5.5 12.0 8.5 8.5 10.0 10.0 19.0
San Diego JC 68.8 6.5 6.6 7.1 6.9 6.6 6.4 40.1 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.5 12.8 8.3 6.6 8.8 8.5 15.9
Wisconsin JL 51.0 5.1 3.9 4.3 4.4 4.0 4.3 26.0 5.0 4.3 5.1 4.6 9.4 7.7 7.6 8.6 6.9 15.6

 

 

 

About the "Webbies"...

The purpose of the JCNA Website Awards is to recognize the efforts made by individual clubs in setting up and maintaining attractive and useful website reflective of the clubs, JCNA and Jaguar automobiles in general. Websites have become an increasingly important tool for JCNA affiliate clubs to promote club activities, increase organization awareness, attract new and retain members. Affiliate websites are eligible to compete for three different awards : Best Overall,   Best Graphics,  & Best Content.

In 2001, the Best Content Award was added to the Best Overall and Graphics Awards introduced in 2000. The new Best Content Award, acknowledges content as the most important element of a website and efforts made to provide varied and up to date content is now recognized.

General Rules and Requirements

•Site must be listed with the correct URL on the club information page located on the JCNA website. It is the club responsibility to maintain the information on the JCNA website.

•Affiliate is in good standing with JCNA.

•Site is public and accessible during judging period.

•Dates of the judging period will be announced on the JCNA website.

•Recipient of any award will be ineligible to receive that same award the following year. In case of a change of webmaster, the site will be eligible only if significantly revised by the new webmaster. (see each award for more information)

•All sites will be judged regardless of award eligibility.

•A website may only receive one award for a given judging period.

Best Overall Award

•Award is based on the aggregate total of all scores as defined on the scoresheet

•Recipient of the Best Overall Award will not be eligible for the same award the following year unless a different webmaster has taken over AND content, graphics and interface has substantially changed. Contact the Website Award Coordinator for eligibility clarification.

Best Graphics Award

•Graphics must be original, use of themes or templates from graphics or web design packages will preclude the site from being considered for the Best Graphics Award.

•Recipient of the Best Graphics Award is ineligible for the same award the following year unless a different webmaster has taken over AND the graphics and interface has substantially changed. Contact the Website Award Coordinator for eligibility clarification.

•Award is awarded to the site that receives the highest Interface and Graphics score as defined below.

•Recipient of the Best Overall Award is ineligible for the Best Graphics Award for the same judging period.

Best Content Award

•Contents (stories, articles, tech tips, pictures...) will be original and unique. Material reproduced from other sources will not be considered. Original content from the club’s newsletter is acceptable.

•Recipient of the Best Content Award is ineligible for the same award the following year unless a different webmaster has taken over AND a significant amount of new content has been posted. Contact the Website Award Coordinator for eligibility clarification.

•Award will be awarded to the site that receives the highest Content score as defined below.

•Recipient of the Best Overall Award is ineligible for the Best Content Award for the same judging period.

Judging Criteria

Content ( 60%) - each item scored from 1 to 10, maximum score 60

  • Uniqueness: Content should be something that is not normally found on other sites. Other sites may have similar content but the editorial presentation would make it unique.
  • Quantity: How much of any item, section, resource etc., is provided? Sites should, at a minimum, provide a balance of quality content over several areas. Sites that provide more quality content over several areas will be ranked higher.
  • Timeliness: is all the content on the site up to date? Time sensitive elements such as calendars, upcoming event notices, results of recent events should be updated in a timely manner. Outdated elements such as past events on the calendar should be removed on a regular basis.
  • Quality: information and articles will be evaluated for correctness and gross spelling / grammatical errors. Non original content such as reprints of articles and stories from other sites or publications will not be considered and will not receive credit. When applicable, completeness will be judged as well such as: contact information and directions for upcoming events, events results, etc.
  • Value: This is the aggregate value of the website to both members and visitors. "Why would a person visit this site more than once?" will be predominant question used to judge this item. Does the site offer articles and material of interest to non-members such as model guides, technical information, etc.
  • Imaging: Images are important to enhance a visitor’s experience of a site. Qualities of composition style and subject matter as well as loading speed are primary considerations. How well images are incorporated in the site's content will be the value of those images. Websites whose images are without titles and/or descriptions and images of poor quality will score less.

Interface and Graphics (20 %) - each item scored from 1 to 10, total score ( 40 maximum ) divided by 2

  • Intuitiveness of Navigation: pages and sections should be easy to find; various features should be grouped together in a logical manner. Buttons, icons and links should be easy to understand and stand out so that visitors can easily find the information they are looking for.
  • Originality: uniqueness of visual theme, navigation structure and page layout will be judged. Do they enhance and complement the visitor's experience of the site?
  • Consistency: Is there a common style format and look throughout the site. Backgrounds, colors, fonts, etc. should be consistent giving the site a unified look.
  • Graphic Styling: while this is obviously a subjective element influenced by which personal, the main consideration should be: Is this site pleasant to view and is it representative of the Jaguar "image"?

Technical (20 %) - each item scored from 1 to 10, total score ( 40 maximum ) divided by 2.  Judges will not analyze each site in details for technical problems but instead will deduct points in each of the following categories as they encounter problems while navigating a site. All sites start with a perfect score for this category.

 

 

[HOME] [MEMBERS] [CALENDAR] [LIBRARY] [STANDINGS] [CLUBS] [JOIN] [CLASSIFIEDS] [FORUMS] [ABOUT] [CONTACT US] [JAGUAR JOURNAL]

  LEGAL NOTICES

REPORT PROBLEM WITH THIS PAGE

© 2002 JAGUAR CLUBS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.